Norman Fairclough’s Textually Oriented Discourse Analysis in Vladimir Nabokov’s Lolita

Pegah Sheibeh, Reza Deedari

Abstract


The present study is an attempt to use “textually oriented discourse analysis” of Norman Fairclough, (1941), to offer a new reading of Vladimir Nabokov’s Lolita (1955). The researcher found it quite appropriate to read the chosen work through Fairclough’s stylistic and discursive features in order to represent the identities of the main characters. Nabokov’s works represent an important portrayal of discursive challenges in the post-war American society that is largely invested in Fairclough’s theory. One of the most apparent aspects in Nabokov’s works is that of social identity and subject formation. As discourse theory denotes, a subject 'misrepresents' the world in ideology because he wants to do so, because there is some reward or benefit to him in doing so. Similarly Humbert Humbert in Lolita is looking for an imaginary world by which he can hide his suppressed identity. He fakes a new identity for himself through fiction. Considering the style of narration in Lolita, some reader consider Humbert as an unreliable narrator, he sometimes makes up some events and in some parts of the story he seems insane and uncertain. In Lolita Nabokov tries to show that each individual creates his/her reality and do not reflect reality. Humbert narrates his personal story from his point of view which might be different from people around him. Reality in Nabokov’s perspective is subjective and mixture of memory and imagination.

 


Keywords


Department of English Literature, Karaj Branch, Islamic Azad University, Alborz, Iran

Full Text:

PDF

References


Apple, A. (1970.). The Annotated Lolita. New York and Toronto: McGraw-Hill.

Barry, S. (2002.). Michel Foucault. Revised Edition. London: Tavistock Publications.

Bertens, H. (2001.).The Literary Theory: The Basics. London: Routledge.

Booker, M. K. (1990). The Baby in the Bathwater: Joyce, Gilbert, and Feminist Criticism. Texas Studies in Literature and Language, 32, 446-67.

Brand, D. (1987). The Interaction of Aestheticism and American Consumer Culture in Nabokov’s Lolita. Modern Language Studies, 17,14-21.

Bressler, C.E. (2007). Literary criticism, New Jersey: Pearson Prentice Hall.

Brown, D. (1935). Herbert R. The Great American Novel. American Literature, 7(1), 1-14. http://links.jstor.org/sici?sici=0002-

Eagleton, T. (1991). Ideology: An Introduction. London: Verso.

Ferretter, L. (2006). Louis Althusser. London: Routledge.

Fairclough, N. (2003). Analyzing Discourse: Textual Analysis for Social Research. London: Routledge.

---. Critical Discourse Analysis: The Critical Study of Language. London: Longman.

Field, A. (1995). Nabokov: His Life in Art. Boston: Little, Brown and Company.

Hawthorn, J. (1994). A Glossary of Contemporary Literary Theory. 2nd ed. London: Edward Arnold Pub.

Hesmondhalgh, D. (2006). “Discourse analysis and content analysis” In: Gillespie, M., and Toynbee, J. (eds) Analyzing Media Texts. Maidenhead: Open University Press.

Nabokov, V. (1997). Lolita. New York: Vintage International.

Toffler, A. (2014). Interview with Vladimir Nabokov. Long form. Web. 30 Apr 2014.

Wodak, R. (2000). What CDA is about in: Wodak, Ruth & Meyer, Michael (eds.). Methods of Critical Discourse Analysis. London: Sage.




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.7575/aiac.ijalel.v.5n.2p.164

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.




Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

2012-2019 (CC-BY) Australian International Academic Centre PTY.LTD

International Journal of Applied Linguistics and English Literature

To make sure that you can receive messages from us, please add the journal emails into your e-mail 'safe list'. If you do not receive e-mail in your 'inbox', check your 'bulk mail' or 'junk mail' folders.