The Effects of Feedback Types on Learners’ Recognition of Lexical Collocations

Abbas Ali Zarei, Maryam Mousavi


This study investigated the effects of three types of feedback on Iranian EFL learners’ recognition of lexical collocations. 78 pre-intermediate students from among 90 were selected to participate in this study. A KET (Key English Test) was used in order to homogenize them. A teacher-made pre-test including all 150 target lexical collocations was used to make sure that the students did not know the target lexical collocations beforehand. Then the participants were divided into three experimental groups. All groups received the same instruction during 10 sessions of treatment. However, they received different types of feedback. Each session, the teacher gave a handout including 15 English sentences to each student. There was one lexical collocation in each sentence which was written in parentheses. Students were asked to write 15 collocations within twenty minutes and then submit the paper to the teacher. Then the teacher underlined the errors and gave them back to the students. Students in group A received direct feedback from the teacher. Students in group B received indirect feedback and the last group received peer feedback on their collocational errors. At the end of the treatment, 30 multiple-choice items were used to test students’ recognition of lexical collocations. The result of One-Way ANOVA procedure revealed that the group that received indirect feedback had the best performance, followed closely by the group that received peer feedback. Students in direct feedback group had the lowest performance. The findings suggest that different types of feedback have different effects on EFL learners’ recognition of lexical collocations.



Collocation, Peer feedback, Direct or Explicit Feedback, Indirect Feedback

Full Text:



Balci, o. & cakir, A. (2012). Teaching vocabulary through collocations in EFL classes: the case of Turkey. Research Studies in Language Learning, 1(1), 21-32.

Bitchener, J. (2008). Evidence in support of written corrective feedback. Journal of Second Language Writing, 17, 102-118.

Chang, C. Y., Chang, S. J., Chen, J. H., & Liou, C. H. (2008). An automatic collocation writing assistant for Taiwanese EFL learners: A case of corpus-based NLP technology. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 21(3), 283-299.

Carter, R. (2001). Vocabulary. In R. Carter and D. Nunan (EDS.), Teaching English to speakers

of other languages (pp. 42-43).Cambridge: Cambridge university press.

Ellis, R. (2009). A typology of written corrective feedback types. ELT Journal, 63(2), 97-107.

Ellis, R., Sheen, Y., Murakami, M. & Takashima, H. (2008). The effects of focused and unfocused written corrective feedback in an English as a foreign language context. System, 36, 353-371.

Erdogan, V. (2005). Contribution of error analysis to foreign language teaching. Mersin University Journal of the Faculty of Education, 1(2), 261-270.

Fahim, M. & Vaezi, R. (2011). investigating the effect of visually-enhanced input on the acquisition of lexical collocations by Iranian intermediate EFL learners: A case of verb-noun lexical collocations. Language Teaching and Research, 2(3), 552-269.

Ferris, D. & Robberts, B. (2001). Error feedback in L2 writing classes. How explicit does it need to be? Journal of Second Language Writing, 10, 161-184.

Frantzen, D. (1995). The effects of grammar supplementation on written accuracy in an intermediate Spanish content course. The Modern Language Journal, 79, 329-344.

Ganji, M (2012). The effects on reading comprehension of lexical collocation instruction, subject matter knowledge, and cultural schema. Theory and Practice in Language Studies, 2(1), 105-112.

Glover, C. & Brown, E. (2006). Written feedback for students: too much, too detailed or too incomprehensible to be effective? BEE-J, 7, 1-16.

Huang, L. (2001). Knowledge of English Collocations: An Analysis of Taiwanese EFL Learners. Foreign Language Education, 6(1), 112-132.

Hong, L. A., Abdul Rahim, H., Hua, K. T. & Salehuddin, K. (2011). Collocation in Malaysian English learners' writing: A corpus-based error analysis. English Language Studies, 17, 31-44.

Hyland, F. (2003). Focusing on form: Student engagement with teacher feedback. System, 31(2), 217-230.

Jing, M. (2008). Erroneous collocations caused by language transfer in Chinese EFL writing. US-China Foreign Language, 6(9), 57-61.

Jukneviciene, R. (2008). Collocations with high-frequency verbs in learner English: Lithuanian learners vs native speakers. Kalbotyra, 59(3), 119-127.

Karoly, A. (2005). The importance of raising collocational awareness in the vocabulary development of intermediate level learners of English. Eger Journal of English Studies, V, 58-69.

Lesniewska, J. (2006). Collections and second language use. Studia Linguistica, 123 , 95-105.

Lima, D. M. (2011). Collaborative tasks and learning occasions in English as a foreign language. RBLA, 11(4), 837-852.

Moehkardi, R. R. (2002). Grammatical and Lexical English Collocations: Some possible problems to Indonesian learners of English. Humaniora, XIV(1), 53-62.

Nesselhauf, N. (2003). The use of collocations by advanced learners of English and some implications for teaching. Applied Linguistics, 24(2), 223-242.

Noonan, B., & Duncan, R. C. (2005). Peer and self-assessment in high schools. Practical Assessment, Research and Evaluation, 10(17), 1-7.

Nagano, T. & Kitao, K. (2008). The necessity of negative feedback for learning L2 collocations. Journal of Culture and Information Science, 3(1), 1-13.

Pishghadam, R., Khodadady, E. & Daliry Rad, N. (2011). The effect of from versus meaning- focused tasks on the development of collocations among Iranian intermediate EFL learners. ELT, 4(2), 180-189.

Rollinson, P. (2005). Using peer feedback in the ESL writing class. ELT Journal, 59(1), 23–30.

Roscoe, R. D. & Chi, M. (2004). The Influence of the tutee in learning by peer tutoring. Proceeding the 26th Annual Meeting of the Cognitive Science Society. Chicago.

Robb, T., Ross, S. & Shortreed, I. (1986). Salience of feedback on error and its effect on EFL writing quality. TESOL Quarterly, 20(1), 82-94.

Shokouhi, H. & Mirsalari, G. (2010). Collocational knowledge versus general linguistic knowledge among Iranian EFL learners. ESL-EJ, 13(4), 1-34.

Salimi, A. E., Tavakoli, M. & Ketabi, S. (2010). The effect of noticing on the judgment of lexical collocations. Retrived March 15, 2012 from

Shin, D. (2007). What collocations would be unpredictable for Korean EFL learners? Korean Journal of Applied Linguistics, 23(2), 83-98.

Shin, D. & Nation, P. (2007). Beyond single words: the most frequent collocations in spoken English. ELT Journal, 91, 1-10.

Semke, D. H. (1984). Effects of the red pen. Foreign Language Annals, 17(3), 195-202.

Truscott, J. (1999). The case for “The case against grammar correction in L2 writing classes”: A response to Ferris. Journal of Second Language Writing, 8(2), 111-122.

Wei, Y. (1999). Teaching collocations for productive vocabulary development. Paper Presented at the Annual Meeting of the Teachers of English to Speakers of Other Languages. New York.

White, E. (2009). Student perspectives of peer assessment for learning in a public speaking course. Asian EFL Journal, 33, 1-55.

Ying, S. (2009). Study on collocations in English writing by Chinese students. Sino-Us English Teaching, 6(3), 25-30.

Zinkgraf, M. (2008). V+N miscollocations in the written production of university level students. ELIA, 8, 91-116.



  • There are currently no refbacks.

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

2012-2022 (CC-BY) Australian International Academic Centre PTY.LTD

International Journal of Applied Linguistics and English Literature

To make sure that you can receive messages from us, please add the journal emails into your e-mail 'safe list'. If you do not receive e-mail in your 'inbox', check your 'bulk mail' or 'junk mail' folders.