Postcolonial Powers of Opposition in Octavia Butler’s Kindred

Thamer Amer JubouriAl_Ogaili, Ruzbeh Babaee

Abstract


This study will examine postcolonial powers of opposition in Octavia Butler’s Kindred (1979); through Homi Bhabha’s concept of ambivalence and Edward Said’s self-other relationship. By using these concepts, this research aims to unravel how the colonized and the colonizer perceive each in the selected works. It will offer an in-depth analysis of the thematic and ideological characteristics of selected works. Thus, the focus will mainly be on the theme of the mutual relationship between the colonized and the colonizer in the selected works. This relationship is specified to the concept of ambivalence. This concept incarnates the dual, yet, uncontrolled relationship between the colonized and the colonizer. Nevertheless, the colonized considers the colonizer as oppressive but an envious power; and the colonizer judges the colonized as inferior but indigenous. The colonial relationship will also be revealed by using the concept of self-other. Such concept scrutinizes the way the colonized and the colonizer perceive and resist each other. Accordingly, the research’s main focus point is the power relationship developed in the light of colonial ambivalence and self-other continuum. The research’s methodology relies on Bhabha’s concept of ambivalence and Edward Said’s self-other relationship.  In The Location of Culture (1994), Bhabha maintains that the concept of ambivalence conveys “the exercise of colonialist authority, however, requires the production of differentiations, individuations, identity effects through which discriminatory practices can map out subject populations that are tarred with the visible and transparent mark of power” (111). Edward Said, in his discussion of self-other relationship in Orientalism (1979), argues that self-other relationship is “the vacillation [inconstancy] between the familiar [self] and the alien [other]” (72).

 


Keywords


Ambivalence, Butler, Hegemony, Postcolonialism, Self-Other Relationship

Full Text:

PDF

References


Bhabha, H.K. (1990). Nation and Narration. London: Routledge

---. (1994). The Location of Culture. London: Routledge.

Bourriaud, N. (2009). The Radicant. New York: Lukas & Sternberg.

Butler, O. (2003). E. Kindred. Boston: Beacon Press.

Davies, B. & Harré, R. P. (1999). The Discursive Production of Selves in R. Harré & L. van Langehove (Eds.), Positioning Theory. Oxford: Blackwell

Duveen, G. (1993). “The development of social representations of gender”. Papers on Social Representations, 2(3),171-177.

Femia, J. (1981). Gramsci’s Political Thought: Hegemony, Consciousness and the Revolutionary Process. New York: Oxford University Press

Fine, B. (1999). The Developmental State is Dead—Long Live Social Capital?, Development and Change. 30.1

Gramsci, A. (1971). Selections From the Prison Notebooks. London: Lawrence and Wishart

Jubouri Al_Ogaili, T. A. & Babaee, R. (2015). Mutinous Colonialism: Navigating Self-Other Dichotomy in Octavia Butler’s Survivor. Advances in Language and Literary Studies, 6(4),166-170

Leftwich, A. (1995).”Bringing Politics Back In: Towards a Model of the Developmental State”. Journal of Development Studies. 31.3

Loomba, A. (2015). Colonialism-Postcolonialism. London: Routledge

Marková, I. (2003). Dialogicality and Social Representations: The Dynamics of Mind. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press

Miliband, R. (1994). Socialism for a Sceptical Age.London: Verso

Molutsi, P. (1989). Whose Interests Do Botswana’s Politicians Represent? in J. Holm and P. Molutsi, eds, Democracy in Botswana. Gaborone: Macmillan

Moscovici, S.The History and Actuality of Social Representations. In G. Duveen (Ed.), Social Representations: Explorations in Social Psychology. New York: New York University Press, 2000.

Pempel, T.J. (1999). The Developmental Regime in a Changing World Economy in M.Woo-Cumings, eds, The Developmental State. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press

Psaltis, C. (2005). Communication and the Construction of Knowledge or Transmission of Belief: The Role of Conversation Type, Bahavioral Style and Social Recognition. Studies in Communication Sciences, 5(2), 209-228

Roy, S. (2009). The Ethical Ambivalence of Resistant Violence: Notes from Postcolonial South Asia. Feminist Review, 9(1), 135-53.

Said, E. W. (1979). Orientalism. New York: Vintage Books

Slocum-Bradley, N. (2009). The Positioning Diamond: A Trans-Disciplinary Framework for Discourse Analysis. Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour. 40:1-29.




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.7575/aiac.ijalel.v.5n.2p.137

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.




Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

2012-2019 (CC-BY) Australian International Academic Centre PTY.LTD

International Journal of Applied Linguistics and English Literature

To make sure that you can receive messages from us, please add the journal emails into your e-mail 'safe list'. If you do not receive e-mail in your 'inbox', check your 'bulk mail' or 'junk mail' folders.