Combining Explicit- Implicit with Focus on Form - Focus on FormS Feedback in EFL Learners' Written Task Accuracy

Asghar Salimi, Davoud Amini, Malahat Yousefzadeh


A number of studies has investigated whether definite types of written corrective feedback combinations of different types are more beneficial  than others. It seems that teaching writing and giving feedback to students’ written task accuracy is an important task for teachers, so this study tried to investigate the effects of different types of feedback (implicit focus on form, explicit focus on form and explicit focus on forms) on EFL learners’ writing. For this purpose, 45 learners of a total number of 90 low intermediate learners studying at Meraj high school in Ardabil were chosen based on their placement test. Initially to make sure that subjects were homogenous, all of them took the Nelson placement test. Results of the test indicated that all of the participation was homogenous. The 45 learners thus were  divided into three groups and each of the groups were received feedback through one of the three forms of  above mentioned At the end of the treatment, the participants in three groups were given a writing posttest. T-Tests and One-way ANOVA were used to test the hypotheses. The results of t-tests showed all types of feedback were effective in improving written accuracy and result of Anova (post hoc) showed that there were significant differences between groups and explicit focus on form outperformed than other types of feedback.



implicit focus on form, explicit focus on form, explicit focus on formS, l2 writing performance at accuracy level

Full Text:



Carroll, S. (2001). Input and evidence. The Raw Material of Second Language Acquisition. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.

Carroll, S., & Swain, M. (1993). Explicit and implicit negative feedback: an empirical study of the learning of linguistic generalizations. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 15, 357-386.

Chandler, J, (2003). The efficacy of various kinds of error feedback for improvement in the accuracy and fluency of L2 student writing. Journal of Second Language Writing, 12, 267-296.

Chauddron, C. (1988). Second language classrooms: Reacher on teaching and learning. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Dabaghi, A & Basturkmen, H. (2009). The effectiveness of implicit and explicit error correction on learners' performance. System, 37, 82–98.

Dekeyser, R. (1993). The effect of error correction on L2 grammar knowledge and oral proficiency. Modern Language Journal, 77, 501-51.

Doughty, C. (1991). Second language instruction does make a difference: Evidence from an empirical study on SL relativization. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 13, 431–469.

Doughty, C. J. (2001). Cognitive underpinnings of focus on form. In P. Robinson (ed.), Cognition and second language instruction (pp.206-55). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Doughty, C. J. & Long, M. H. (2003). The handbook of Second Language Acquisition. Blackwell Publishing Ltd.

Doughty, C. J. & Williams, J. (eds.) (1998). Focus on form in classroom second language acquisition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Ellis, R. (1994). The study of second language acquisition. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Ellis, R. (2001). Investigating form-focused instruction. Language Learning, 51(1), 1–46.

Ellis, R. (2002). Does form-focused instruction affect the acquisition of implicit knowledge? A review of the research. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 24, 223-236.

Ellis, R. (2003). Task-based language learning and teaching. Oxford: OUP.

Ellis, R (Ed.) (2005). Planning and task performance in a second language. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.

Ellis, R. (2009). A typology of written corrective feedback types. ELT Journal, 63(2), 97-107.

Ferris, D. (1997). The influence of teacher commentary on student revision. TESOL Quarterly, 29, 33-53.

Fowler, W.S., and Coe, N. (1976). Nelson English language tests. Thomas Nelson Ltd.

Fulcher,G. & Davidson, F. (2007). Language Testing and Assessment: an advanced resource book. London: Routledge.

Hamp-Lyons, L., & Heasley, B. (1987). Study writing. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Harley, B. (1998). The role of form-focused tasks in promoting the second language acquisition of children in grade 2. In: Doughty, C., Williams, J. (Eds.), Focus on Form in Classroom Second language Acquisition. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp. 156–174.

Hyland, F. (2010). Future directions in feedback on second language writing: Overview and research agenda. International Journal of English Studies, 10(2), 171-182.

Izumi, S., 2002. Output, input enhancement, and the noticing hypothesis: An experimental study on ESL relativization. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 24, 541–577.

Kim, H. & Matches, G. (2001). Explicit vs. Implicit corrective feedback. The korea TESOL Journal, 4, 1-15.

Leow, R. (1997). Attention, awareness, and foreign language behavior. Language Learning, 47(3), 467–505.

Lew , A. w. M. (2007). Pondering over Focus on Form and Focus on FormS: Are There “Equivalent and Large Effects”? Columbia University Working Papers in TESOL & Applied Linguistics, 7(1), 1-2.

Long, M. (1996). The role of linguistic environment in second language acquisition. In W. C.Ritchie & B. K. Bahtia (Eds.), Handbook of second language acquisition (pp. 413-468).New York: Academic Press.

Long, M. H. & Doughty, C. J. (2009).The handbook of Language Teaching. Blackwell Publishing Ltd.

Lyster, R. (1998). Recasts, repetition and ambiguity in l2classroom discourse. Studies in second language Acquisition 20(1), 51-81.

Lyster, R. (2004). Differential effects of prompts and recasts in form-focused instruction. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 26, 399-432.

Lyster, R., & Mori, H. (2006). Interactional feedback and interactional counterbalance. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 28, 209–300.

Lyster, R. &Ranta, L. (1997). corrective feedback and learner uptake: Negotiation of form in communicative classrooms. Studies in second language Acquisition, 19(1), 37-66.

Nagata, N. (1993). Intelligent computer feedback for second language instruction. Modern Language Journal, 77, 330-339.

Norris. J. & Ortega, N (2000). Effectiveness of L2 instruction: a research synthesis and quantitative meta-analysis. Language Learning, 50(3), 417-528.

Rahimpour M, Salimi A (2010). The impact of explicit instruction on foreign language learners' performance. Procedia- Social and Behavioral Sciences, 2, 1740-1746.

Robinson, P. (1997b). Individual differences and the fundamental similarity of implicit and explicit adult second language learning. Language Learning, 47(1), 45–99.

Rutherford, W. (1984). Language universals and second language acquisition. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamin Publishing Company.

Ryan, K. (1997). Lecturer comments and student responses. Directions in Teaching and Learning. 69, 5-13.

Saeidi, M., Zaferanieh, E., & Shatery, H. (2012). On the Effects of Focus on Form, Focus on Meaning, and Focus on Forms on Learners’Vocabulary Learning in ESP Context. ELT, 5(10), 72-79.

Sanz, C. (2003). Computer delivered implicit vs. explicit feedback in processing instruction. In B. VanPatten (Ed.): Processing Instruction: Theory, Research, and Commentary (pp. 60-99). Mahwah, N.J.: Lawrence Erlbaum.

Sheen, R. (2002). Key concepts in ELT: Focus on from and focus on forms. ELT journal, 56(3),

Sheen, Y. (2006). Exploring the relationship between characteristics of recasts and learner uptake. Language Teaching Research, 10(4), 361-392.

Swain, M., Lapkin, S. (1998). Interaction and second language learning: two adolescent French immersion students working together. The Modern Language Journal, 82(3), 20–337.

Truscott, J. (2004). Evidence and conjecture on the effects of correction: A response to Chandler. Journal of second language writing, 13, 337-47.



  • There are currently no refbacks.

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

2012-2020 (CC-BY) Australian International Academic Centre PTY.LTD

International Journal of Applied Linguistics and English Literature

To make sure that you can receive messages from us, please add the journal emails into your e-mail 'safe list'. If you do not receive e-mail in your 'inbox', check your 'bulk mail' or 'junk mail' folders.