Aligning Teaching and Assessment to Course Objectives: The Case of Preparatory Year English Program at King Abdulaziz University

Rania Kabouha, Tariq Elyas

Abstract


This research paper   discusses the concept of constructive alignment theory (Biggs, 1996) with the learning outcomes in teaching of English at a Saudi university. The Saudi context has received no empirical attention in the professional literature. Thus, this paper uses constructive alignment framework to examine the Foundation Year English Program (FYEP) curriculum at King Abdul-Aziz University, Saudi Arabia. More specifically, one of the major components of this program, namely, the speaking course, was  used as an example to evaluate the extent to which intended learning outcomes, assessment practices, and teaching methods are aligned in this course. It should be mentioned that the 104 speaking course has been selected as an example for two main reasons, which will be discussed in the paper. Therefore, some suggestions are provided to help solve this issue constructively. The paper also highlights the importance of using the constructive alignment framework to enhance teaching, learning, and assessment in English Language Institute (hereafter ELI).This paper is divided into four sections. Following the introduction, it reviews the existing literature on the notion of constructive alignment theory and its pedagogical outcomes in EFL instruction. It then briefly describes the ELI English program and pinpoints the incongruity between the program objectives and the intended learning outcomes. The second section focuses on analysis of the components of the speaking course through Constructive Alignment Framework. The next section identifies some factors, which negatively affect the speaking course. The last section of this paper discusses the implications of constructive alignment for learning and teaching in ELI.

 


Keywords


Constructive Alignment Framework, EFL Instruction, Objectives, Learning Outcomes, Saudi Arabia, EFL, English Language Institute

Full Text:

PDF

References


Alderson, J.C., Clapham, C., & Wall, D. (1995). Language test construction and evaluation.Cambridge: CambridgeUniversity Press.

Al-Subahi, A.(2001). Evaluation of the English programme (ESA) at Saudi intermediate school. Journal of KingAbdulazizUniversity, Educational &Sciences, 14, 3-86.

Biggs, J.(1996). Enhancing teaching through constructive alignment. HigherEducation, 32, 347-364.

Biggs, J. (2003). Aligning teaching and assessing to course objectives. Teaching and Learning in Higher Education: New Trends and Innovations. University of Aveiro, 13-17 April 2003.

Biggs, J. B., & Tang, T. S. (2009). Teaching for quality learning at university(3rd ed.).Maindenhead: Open University Press.

Brabrand, C.(2007).Constructive alignment for teaching model-based design for concurrency: A case study on implementing alignment. Depart. University of Aarhus, Debmark.

Burns, M.K.(2008).What is formative evaluation? Minnesota Center for Reading Research.

Carpenter, A.(2008). Academics and learners’ perceptions of assessment. Institute of Technology Carlow. AISHE Conference August 2008.

Chua, E. R.(2013). Constructive alignment vs experiential learning for ESL students. Arab World Journal, 4 (2), 235-245.

Clark, I. (2011). The Development of 'Project1': Formative Assessment Strategies in UK Schools. Current Issues in Education, 13(3), 1-34.

Dames, G.E.(2012).Enhancing of teaching and learning through constructive alignment. Acta Theologica, 2,35-53.doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.4314/actat.v32i2.3

Freeman, D.L.(2003).Techniques and principles in language teaching(2nd ed.).Oxford:Oxford University Press.

Harden, R. (2002b). Learning outcomes and instructional objectives: is there a difference? Medical Teacher, 24, 151-155.

Karagiorgi,Y.,& Symeou, L.(2005). Translating Constructivism into instructional design: Potential and limitations. Educational Technology and Society, 8(1), 17-27.

Lawrence,B., & Snyder,L.(2009).Process education and constructive alignment: Thechallenge of student Assessment Online. International Journal of Process Education,1(1),25-30.

Nightingale, S., Carew, A., & Fung, J. (2007).Application of Constructive Alignment Principles to Engineering Education: Have we really changed? Proceedings of the 2007 AaeE Conference, Melbourne.

Prosser, M., &Trigwell, K. (1998). Teaching for learning in higher education. Buckingham:Open University Press.

Shaaban,K.(2001).Assessment of young learners. English Teaching Forum, 39(4),16-24.

Shuell, T. J. (1986). Cognitive conceptions of learning. Review of Educational Research, 56, 411-436.

Squires, G. (1999). Teaching as a professional discipline. London: Falmer Press.

Tambini, R.F.(1999).Aligning learning activities and assessment strategies in the ESL classroom. The Internet TESL Journal,5(9).Retrieved from http://iteslj.org/Articles/Tambini-Aligning.html)

The English Language Institute, King Abdul-Aziz University. (2013)

White, E. (2012). Are You Assessment Literate? Some Fundamental Questions Regarding

Effective Classroom-based Assessment. Retrieved from http://jaltcue.org/files/OnCUE/OCJ3-1articles/OCJ3-1-White-pp3-25.pdf.




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.7575/aiac.ijalel.v.4n.5p.82

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.




Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

2012-2020 (CC-BY) Australian International Academic Centre PTY.LTD

International Journal of Applied Linguistics and English Literature

To make sure that you can receive messages from us, please add the journal emails into your e-mail 'safe list'. If you do not receive e-mail in your 'inbox', check your 'bulk mail' or 'junk mail' folders.