Group Dynamic Assessment (G-DA): The Case for the Development of Control over the Past Tense

Ehsan Mehri, Majid Amerian

Abstract


The introduction of dynamic assessment within sociocultural theory opened a new door toward looking at the relationship between the teaching and assessment. The dialectic relationship between the two processes provides previously unfound information regarding the assessment and the development of the learners. However, the implementation of the interactionist dynamic assessment has carried some difficulties in class in general and the groups in particular. The current study tries to address the effect of group dynamic assessment on the development of the control over the past tense; therefore, it is two-folded in the aim. Not only does it work as a practical sample of group dynamic assessment in class, but also it seeks to analyze its effect on the development of control over the past tense. To this end, three learners at the levels of elementary, low-intermediate, and intermediate general proficiency were asked to read a novel and retell the story. The dynamic intervention provided by the teacher during the story retelling was later evaluated in the transcendence tasks of writing. The Friedman test indicated that the three learners had significant development in their control over the past tense in their writing. Moreover, the qualitative analysis of the interactions suggests that the learners changed their role from the mere receivers of the teacher's mediator into the active providers of mediation to other group members. Also, they developed their understanding of the concept of the past tense through implementing it in transcendence tasks of writing.


Keywords


Sociocultural theory; dynamic assessment; group dynamic assessment; zone of proximal development; interaction

Full Text:

PDF

References


Aljaafreh, A., & Lantolf, J. P. (1994). Negative feedback as regulation and second language learning in the zone of proxiam development. Modern Language Journal, 78(4), 465-83.

Amerian, M., & Mehri, E. (2014). Scaffolding in sociocultural theory: Definition, steps, features, conditions, tools, and effective consideration. Scientific Journal of Review, 3(7), 756-65.

Anton, M. (2009). Dynamic assessment of advanced second language learners. Foreign Language Annals, 42(3), 576-98.

Birjandi, P., Estaji, M, & Deyhim, T. (2013). The impact of dynamic assessment on reading comprehension and metacognitive awareness of reading strategy use in Iranian high school learners. Iranian Journal of Language Testing, 3(2), 60-77.

Chaiklin, S. (2003). The zone of proximal development in Vygotsky's analysis of learning and instruction. In A. Kozulin, B. Gindis, V. Ageyev, & S. Miller (Eds.), Vygotsky's educational theory and practice in cultural context (pp. 39-64). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

De Beer, M. (2002). The construction and evaluation of a dynamic computerized adaptive test for the measurement of learning potential. Unpublished Doctoral Thesis, University of South Africa.

Donato, R. (1994). Collective scaffolding in second language learning. In J. P. Lantolf and G. Apple (Eds.). Vygotskian approaches to second language research, (pp. 33-56). Norwood, NJ: Albex.

Feuerstein, R., Rand, Y., & Rynders, E. J. (1988). Don't accept me as I am: Helping retarded people to excel. US: Plenum.

Hill, K., & Sabet, M. (2009). Dynamic speaking assessment. TESOL Quarterly, 43(3), 537-45.

Kozulin, A. (2011). Learning potential and cognitive modifiability. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice, 18(2), 169-81.

Lantolf, J. P. (2000). Sociocultural theory and second language learning. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Lantolf, J. P., & Poehner, M. E. (2004). Dynamic assessment: Bringing the past into the future. Journal of Applied Linguistics, 1(1), 49-76.

Lantolf, J. P., & Yanez-Prieto, M. C. (2003). Talking yourself into Spanish: The role of private speech in second language learning. Hispania, 86(1), 98-110.

Long, M. (1990). The least a second language acquisition theory needs to explain. TESOL Quarterly, 24(4), 649-66.

Mehri, E., & Amerian, M. (in process). Challenges to dynamic assessment in second language learning.

Newman, D., Griffin, P., & Cole, M. (1989). The construction zone: Working for cognitive change in school. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Petrovsky, A. V. (1985). Studies in psychology: The collective and the individual. Moscow: Progress.

Poehner, M. E. (2005). Dynamic assessment of oral proficiency among advanced L2 learners of French. Doctoral Dissertation. The Pennsylvania State University, State College.

Poehner, M. E. (2008). Dynamic assessment: A Vygotskian approach to understanding and promoting second language development. Berlin: Springer Publishing.

Poehner, M. E. (2009). Group dynamic assessment: Mediation for the L2 classroom. TESOL Quarterly, 43(3), 471-91.

Poehner, M. E., & Lantolf, J. P. (2005). Dynamic assessment in the language classroom. Language Teaching Research, 9(3), 233-65.

Poehner, M. E., & Lantolf, J. P. (2010). Vygotsky's teaching-assessment dialectic and L2 education: The case for dynamic assessment. Mind, Culture, and Activity, 17(4), 312-30.

Poehner, M. E., & van Compernolle, R. A. (2013). L2 development around test: Learner response processes and dynamic assessment. IRAL, 51(4), 353-71.

Sternberg, R. J., & Grigorenko, E. L. (2002). Dynamic testing: The nature and measurement of learning potential. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Tajeddin, Z., & Tayebipour, F. (2012). The effect of dynamic assessment on EFL learners' acquisition of request and apology. Journal of Teaching Language Skills, 4(2), 87-118.

Vyogtsky, L. (1986). Language and Thought. USA: MIT.

Walqui, A. (2006). Scaffolding instruction for English language learners: A conceptual framework. International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism, 9(2), 159-80.

Wells, G. (1999). Dialogic inquiry: toward a sociocultural practice and theory of education. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press

Xiaoxiao, L., & Yan, L. (2010). A case study of dynamic assessment in EFL process writing. Chinese Journal of Applied Lingusitics, 33(1), 24-40.

Zhang, Y. (2013). The theoretical construction of dynamic assessment mode in Chinese tertiary EFL writing class with online teaching and scoring system. CALL-EJ, 14(2), 38-50.




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.7575/aiac.ijalel.v.4n.5p.11

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.




Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

2012-2019 (CC-BY) Australian International Academic Centre PTY.LTD

International Journal of Applied Linguistics and English Literature

To make sure that you can receive messages from us, please add the journal emails into your e-mail 'safe list'. If you do not receive e-mail in your 'inbox', check your 'bulk mail' or 'junk mail' folders.