Semantic Framing of NATIONALISM in the National Anthems of Egypt and England

Esra' Mustafa

Abstract


Every human experience can be conceptually represented in terms of semantic frames. Frames set the major cognitive general aspects of any concept, as well as the contextual variants of such a concept. Being a universal concept, NATIONALISM is central to the human cognition. However, political scientists and dictionary makers differently view it. This study makes use of semantic frame in understanding NATIONALISM as expressed in English and Egyptian national anthems. It aims at capturing the similarities and differences between the anthems in order to render the basic constituents of the frame. It is evident that despite the different scenes represented in each anthem’s frame, NATIONALISM typically actives the frame of people, place, power and principles. The eight national anthems, subject to the analysis, along with a number of political science definitions of NATIONALISM can be contained under this general conceptual frame.  The frame interacts with the basics of sociology. Being developed over time and place, NATIONALISM still summons the same frame of a society of people gathered in one place sharing the same principles and governed by the same power. However, the kind of power, place, and principles varies according to the physical scene. 

 


Keywords


Cognitive linguistics; Semantic framework; Bilady; Egypt; England; National Anthems

Full Text:

PDF

References


Al-Missiri, A. (2007). Studies in poetry. (in Arabic)Cairo: Al-Shrouk International Library.

Anderson, B. (1991). Imagined Communities: Reflections on the Origin and Spread of Nationalism. Revised Edition ed. London and New York: Verso.

Barsalou, L. (1992). Frames, Concepts, and conceptual fields. In Lehrer, A. & Kittay, E. (eds). Frames, Fields and Contrasts. New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum.

Barsalou, L. (1993). Flexibility, structures, and linguistic vagary in concepts: Manifestations of a compositional system of perceptual symbols. In Collins, A., Gathercole, S., Conway, M. & Morris, P. (eds.), Theories of Memory. New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum

Billig, M (1993). Studying nationalism as an everyday ideology. Papers on Social Representations (PSR), 2. Online.

Essam, B. A. (2015). Melopoetic of the national anthem of Egypt: a case study. ACCEPTED ARTICLE IN PRESS Higher Education of Social Science, 8(1), 1-16.

Evans, V. & Green, M. (2006). Cognitive linguistics: An Introduction. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press

Evans, V. (2007). A glossary of cognitive linguistics. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.

Fillmore, C. & Atkins, B. (1992). Toward a frame-based lexicon: the semantics of RISK and its neighbors’. In Lehrer, A. & Kittay, E. (eds). Frames, Fields and Contrasts. New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum. pp. 75–102

Fillmore, C. & Baker, C. (2009). A frames approach to semantic analysis. In Heine, B. & Narrog, H. (eds), The Oxford Handbook of Linguistic Analysis. Oxford: Oxford University Press

Fillmore, C. (1975) ‘An alternative to checklist theories of meaning’, Proceedings of the First Annual Meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society. Amsterdam: North Holland, pp. 123–31

Fillmore, C. (1977). Scenes-and-frames semantics, in Zampolli, A. (ed.), Linguistic Structures Processing. Amsterdam: North Holland, pp. 55–82

Fillmore, C. (1985). Frames and the semantics of understanding. Quaderni di Semantica, (6). Bologna : Società editrice il Mulino

Fillmore, C. (2006). Frame semantics. In Geeraerts, D. (Cognitive linguistics: basic readings). Berlin: Gruyter.

Gellner, E. (1983). Nations and Nationalism. Ithaca: Cornell University Press. pp. 6-7.

Lo, c., & Wu, D. (2011). MEANT: An inexpensive, high-accuracy, semi-automatic metric for evaluating translation utility via semantic frames. Proceedings of the 49th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics. Oregon: the Association for Computational Linguistics.

Petruck, M. (1995). Frame semantics and the lexicon: nouns and verbs in the body frame. In Essays in Semantics and Pragmatics: In Honor of Charles J. Fillmore. Shibatani‏, M. & Thompson, S.‏ (eds). John Benjamins compan

PETRUCK, M.( 1996). Frame semantics. In: Verschueren, J. et al. (Ed.). Handbook of pragmatics. Philadelphia: John Benjamins.

Richards, j. & Schmidt, R. (2010): Longman Dictionary of language Teaching and Applied Linguistics. 4th Edition. Edinburgh: Pearson

Smith, A. (1991). National Identity. Reno: University of Nevada Press.

The e-government of Egypt: URL <> Retrieved on January 6th, 2015.

Xie, B., Passonneau, R., Wu, L. & Creamer, G. (2013). Semantic Frames to Predict Stock Price Movement. Proceedings of the 51st Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics. Sofia: Association for Computational Linguistics.




DOI: https://doi.org/10.7575/aiac.ijalel.v.4n.4p.62

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.




Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

2012-2022 (CC-BY) Australian International Academic Centre PTY.LTD

International Journal of Applied Linguistics and English Literature

To make sure that you can receive messages from us, please add the journal emails into your e-mail 'safe list'. If you do not receive e-mail in your 'inbox', check your 'bulk mail' or 'junk mail' folders.