P A Jungian Approach to Self-fragmentation of Twentieth Century in Orwell’s Nineteen Eighty Four

Mozhdeh Alizadeh Shirazi, Wan Roselezam Wan Yahya

Abstract


The problematic life of modern human has always been a significant issue for many areas of study. In reaction to the absence of romantic values and the unity of the pre-modern world, Human being was afflicted with a sense of inner crises which is referred to as self-fragmentation. Fragmentation is one of the significant features of twentieth century when a mode of anxiety subjugated both art and society. In such an atmosphere many writers of the modern century attempted to reflect in their works of literature, what they had experienced in the real world. Orwell’s Nineteen Eighty Four is one of the popular novels of Modern Era that describes a modern but fragmented society wherein the modern human’s lack of self-integration is perceptible. By representing how the protagonists respond to the voices of their psyches through characterization and dreams, which is also of crucial significance in Jung’s Analytical Psychology, Orwell explores the roots of modern human’s urge for achieving a cohesive sense of self. Accordingly, this study, attempts to illustrate how modern human steps in the path of individuation and to what extent these efforts meet with success, if any. To achieve this goal, some terms and notions of Jungian Criticism such as archetypes and the process of individuation will be borrowed, and a particular focus will be held on dreams occurring in the course of the story. In addition, this paper would like to argue that the dystopian society portrayed in these novels is the offspring of a mere rationalism which prevents human from knowing the opposing forces working within as well as the forces functioning from without.

 


Keywords


individuation, archetypes, anima/animus, fragmentation of self

Full Text:

PDF

References


Azizmohammadi, F., & Saadatmanesh, S. (2013). Analysis of Lexical Adjustment in two persian translations of George Orwell's" Nineteen Eighty-Four. Journal of Science and today's world, 2(6), 726-731.

Barry, P. (2002). Beginning theory : an introduction to literary and cultural theory (pp. 81). Manchester [u.a.]: Manchester University Press.

Brooker, J. S. (1992). Reading The Waste Land: Modernism and the limits of interpretation: Univ of Massachusetts Press.

Brown, D. (1989). The Modernist self in twentieth-century English literature : a study in self-fragmentation. Basingstoke: GB : Macmillan press.

Chang, H.-M., Ivonin, L., Diaz, M., Catala, A., Chen, W., & Rauterberg, M. (2013). Experience the World with Archetypal Symbols: A New Form of Aesthetics. Distributed, Ambient, and Pervasive Interactions, 205-214.

Cirlot, J. E. (1962). A Dictionary of Symbols, trans. Jack Sage (New York: Philosophical Library, 1962), 201.

Ferber, M. (1999). A dictionary of literary symbols: Cambridge University Press Cambridge.

Fuchs, T. (2007). Fragmented Selves: Temporality and Identity in Borderline Personality Disorder. Psychopathology, 40(6), 379-387.

Gibb, M. (2012). The Call to Individuation Reflections on Learning, Life and Work (pp. 67-74): Springer.

Gleason, A. (1984). " Totalitarianism" in 1984. Russian Review, 43(2), 145-159.

Greenwald, A. G. (1980). The totalitarian ego: Fabrication and revision of personal history. American Psychologist, 35(7), 603. doi: 10.1037/0003-066x.35.7.603

Gutierrez, D. (1984). Incarceration and Torture: The Self in Extremity. Human Rights Quarterly, 6(3), 284-308. doi: 10.2307/762003

Hall, J., & Clark, K. (Eds.). (1979). Dictionary of subjects and symbols in art: Harper & Row New York.

Hensley, M. (2006). The Green World of Dystopian Fiction, Diss: Western Kentucky University.

Janis, I. B., Veague, H. B., & Driver-Linn, E. (2006). Possible selves and borderline personality disorder. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 62(3), 387-394. doi: 10.1002/jclp.20230

Jung, C. G. (1951). Aion. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.

Jung, C. G. (1953). Two essays on analytical psychology. New York: Pantheon Books for Bollingen Foundation.

Jung, C. G. (1954). The development of personality (R. F. C. Hull, Trans.). Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press.

Jung, C. G. (1959). The archetypes and The collective unconscious (R. F. C. Hull, Trans.). Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press.

Jung, C. G. (1968). Approaching The Uncoscious. In C. G. Jung, M. L. Von Franz, J. Jacobi & A. Jaffe (Eds.), Man and His symbols. New York: Dell Pub.

Jung, C. G. (1971). Psychological Types (H. G. Baynes, Trans. Vol. 6). London; Princeton, N.J.: Routledge and K. Paul : Princeton University Press.

Kateb, G. (1966). The Road to 1984. Political Science Quarterly, 81(4), 564-580.

Lowenthal, D. (1969). Orwell's Political Pessimism in '1984'. Polity, 2(2), 160-175.

Mahmoodi, K., Pillai, S., & M.M, R. (2012). Historical Hegemony: Fractured Identity and Mono-vocalization in Sadegh Hedayat’s Blind Owl. Akademika, 82(2), 45-54.

Meredith-Owen, W. (2012). The hero, the anima and the claustrum: anality and idealization. Journal of Analytical Psychology, 57(2), 167-186. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-5922.2011.01960.x

Morris, G. B. (2012). Human Behavior in an Emerging Totalitarian Society. Canadian Journal of Counselling and Psychotherapy/Revue canadienne de counseling et de psychothérapie, 11(1).

Nussbaum, M. C., Gleason, A., & Goldsmith, J. (2005). On Nineteen eighty-four : Orwell and our future. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press.

Orwell, G. (1949). Nineteen Eighty-Four. Fairfield (IA): 1st World Library - Literary Society.

Orwell, G. (1954). Why I Write. 1947. A Collection of Essays by George Orwell, 313-320.

Osborne, T. (2011). Rationality, choice and modernism: Notes on Jon Elster’s theory of creativity. Rationality and Society, 23(2), 175-197. doi: 10.1177/1043463111404672

Quinn, E. (2009). Critical Companion to George Orwell: Infobase Publishing.

Regis, H. F. (2013). 1984 GEORGE ORWELL. Revista Letras Raras, 1(1), 109-115.

Resch, R. P. (1997). Utopia, Dystopia, and the Middle Class in George Orwell's Nineteen Eighty-Four. boundary 2, 24(1), 137-176.

Roazen, P. (1978). Orwell, Freud, and 1984. The Virginia quarterly review, 54(4), 675.

Rodden, J. (2007). The cambridge companion to george orwell: Cambridge University Press.

Sawant, N. (2012). Evolution of George Orwell as a Novelist. Journal of Literature, Culture and Media Studies, 3(5&6), 21-30.

Schimmel, P. (2002). ‘IN MY END IS MY BEGINNING’: T.S. ELIOT'S THE WASTE LAND AND AFTER. British Journal of Psychotherapy, 18(3), 381-399. doi: 10.1111/j.1752-0118.2002.tb00039.x

Stape, J. H. (Ed.). (1996). The Cambridge Companion to Joseph Conrad. Cambrige: Cambridge University Press.

Stewart, R. (1981). Orwell's Waste Land. International Fiction Review, 8(2).

Tyner, J. A. (2004). Self and space, resistance and discipline: a Foucauldian reading of George Orwell's 1984. Social & Cultural Geography, 5(1), 129-149.

Varricchio, M. (1999). Power of Images/Images of Power in Brave New World and Nineteen Eighty-Four. Utopian Studies, 10(1), 98-114.

Von Franz, M.-L. (1968). The Process of Individuation. In C. G. Jung, M. L. Von Franz, J. Jacobi & A. Jaffe (Eds.), Man and his symbols. New York: Dell Pub.




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.7575/aiac.ijalel.v.3n.6p.224

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.




Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

2012-2019 (CC-BY) Australian International Academic Centre PTY.LTD

International Journal of Applied Linguistics and English Literature

To make sure that you can receive messages from us, please add the journal emails into your e-mail 'safe list'. If you do not receive e-mail in your 'inbox', check your 'bulk mail' or 'junk mail' folders.