Self-perceived Listening Comprehension Strategies Used by Iranian EFL Students

Sara Nowrouzi, Tam Shu Sim, Gholamreza Zareian, Vahid Nimehchisalem

Abstract


Numerous studies are available on L2 learners’ strategy use; however, there is no study investigating the Iranian tertiary level EFL learners’ listening strategy use. The present paper reports the findings of a cross-sectional study that explored a group of Iranian EFL learners’ (n = 100) use of listening comprehension strategies. The instrument that was used for collecting the data was called the Listening Strategy Use Questionnaire (LSUQ) by Nowrouzi, Tam, Nimehchisalem, and Zareian (2014). The instrument divides listening strategies into cognitive, metacognitive, and socio-affective categories. Based on the results, on average the respondents reported low levels of self-perceived use of cognitive, metacognitive, and socio-affective strategies. The results indicate a serious need to focus more on the students’ listening comprehension skills in general and their listening strategies in particular.

 


Keywords


EFL language teaching and learning, Listening skills, Listening strategies

Full Text:

PDF

References


Alvari, A. (1998). Learners’ strategies in vocabulary learning: A case study of Iranian EFL university students. MA Thesis. Shiraz University, Iran.

Asgary, H. A. (2001). The relationship between the level of listening and the choice of listening strategies by Iranian EFL undergraduate students. MA Thesis. University of Science and Technology, Iran.

Bacon, S. M. (1992). The relationship between gender, comprehension, processing strategies, and cognitive and affective response in foreign language listening. Modern Language Journal, 76(2), 160-177.

Borzabadi, F. D. (2000). The relationship between language learning strategies and fields of study, sex, language proficiency, and learning styles. PhD Thesis. Allameh Tabatabie University, Iran.

Chamot, A. U. (2005). Language learning strategy instruction: Current issues and research. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics 25, 112-130.

Cohen, A.D., Weaver, S. J., & Li, T. Y. (1998). The impact of strategies-based instruction on speaking a foreign language. In A. D. Cohen (Ed), Strategies in learning and using a second language (pp. 107-156). London: Longman.

Ebrahimi, A. (2002). A comparative study of language learning strategies employed by bilinguals and monolinguals with reference to attitudes and motivation. MA Thesis. Teacher Training University, Iran.

Eckerth, J., Schramm, K., & Tschirner, E. (2009). Review of recent research (2002–2008) on applied linguistics and language teaching with specific reference to L2 German (part 1), Language Teaching, 42(1), 41-66.

El-Dib, M.A.B. (2004). Language learning strategies in Kuwait: Links to gender, language level, and culture in a hybrid context. Foreign Language Annals, 37(1), 85-95.

Etemad, B. (1998). The role of vocabulary learning strategies on vocabulary retention and on language proficiency in Iranian EFL students. MA Thesis. Teacher Training University, Iran.

Fan, M. Y. (2003). Frequency of use, perceived usefulness, and actual usefulness of second language vocabulary strategies: A study of Hong Kong learners. Modern Language Journal, 87(2), 222-241.

Farshid, M. (2003). The effects of separate and integrated presentation of reading strategies on the reading comprehension ability of the Iranian students. MA Thesis. Allameh Tabatabaie University, Iran.

Goh, C. C. M. (2008). Metacognitive instruction for second language listening development: Theory, practice and research implications RELC Journal, 39(2), 188-213.

Hadji Vosuq, S. A. (2000). The relationship between the form of material ( dialog vs. monolog) and note-taking, and listening comprehension. MA Thesis. Tarbiat Modares University, Iran.

Khajeh, A. (2002). Relationship between tolerance of ambiguity, gender, level of proficiency, and use of second language learning strategies. MA Thesis. Tarbiat Modares University, Iran.

Liu, N. F. (2002). Processing problems in L2 listening comprehension of university students in Hong Kong. (Doctoral dissertation). Retrieved on April 5, 2010 from ProQuest Dissertations & Theses database. (UMI No. 3074191)

Macaro, E. (2006). Strategies for language learning and for language use: Revising the theoretical framework. Modern Language Journal, 90(3), 320-337.

Naiman, N., Fröhlich, M. Stern, H. H. & Todesco. A. (1978). The good language learner. Toronto: Ontario Institute for Studies in Education.

National Capital Language Resource Center (NCLRC). (2004). The essentials of language teaching: Strategies for developing listening skills. Washington, DC: National Capital Language Resource Center. Retrieved on April 5, 2007 from http://www.nclrc.org.

Nowrouzi, S., Tam, S. S., Nimehchisalem, V., and Zareian, G. (2014). Developing an instrument for Iranian EFL learners’ listening comprehension problems and listening strategies. Advances in Language and Literacy Studies 5(3).

O’Malley, J. M. & Chamot, A. U. (1990). Learning strategies in second language acquisition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Oxford, R. L. (1990). Language learning strategies: What every teacher should know. New York: Newbury House.

Oxford, R., Cho, Y., Leung, S. & Kim, H-J. (2004). Effect of the presence and difficulty of task on strategy use: An exploratory study. International Review of Applied Linguistics, 42(1), 1-47.

Ozeki, N. (2000). Listening strategy instruction for female EFL college students in Japan. PhD Thesis. Indiana University of Pennsylvania.

Rahimi, M. (2004). An investigation into factors affecting the Iranian EFL students' perceived use of language learning strategies. PhD Thesis. Shiraz University, Iran.

Ranjbari, R. (2000). The impact of metacognitive vocabulary learning strategy instruction on lexical knowledge of Iranian EFL students. MA Thesis. Iran University of Science and Technology.

Rubin, J. (1975). What the ‘Good Language Learner’ can teach us. TESOL Quarterly, 9(1), 41-51.

Sedaghat. M. (2001). The effects of attitude, motivation (instrumental and integrative) and proficiency level on the use of listening comprehension strategies by Iranian female EFL students. MA Thesis. Shiraz University, Iran.

Stern, H. H. (1975). What can we learn from the good language learner? Canadian Modern Language Review, 31(4), 304-318.

Vandergrift, L. (1997). The comprehension strategies of second language (French) listeners: A descriptive study. Foreign Language Annals, 30(3), 387-409.

Vandergrift, L. (2003). Orchestrating strategy use: Toward a model of the skilled second language listener. Language Learning, 53(3), 463-496.

Vandergrift, L., Goh, C. C. M. Mareschal, C. & Tafaghodtari, M. H. (2006). The metacognitive awareness listening questionnaire: Development and validation. 56(3), 431-462.

Yadegari, S. (2004). The relationship between personality types and language learning strategies deployed by EFL distance learners. MA Thesis. Tarbiat Modares University, Iran.




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.7575/aiac.ijalel.v.3n.6p.35

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.




Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

2012-2020 (CC-BY) Australian International Academic Centre PTY.LTD

International Journal of Applied Linguistics and English Literature

To make sure that you can receive messages from us, please add the journal emails into your e-mail 'safe list'. If you do not receive e-mail in your 'inbox', check your 'bulk mail' or 'junk mail' folders.