Investigating Elementary & Intermediate Level Students’ Perspectives towards Demotivating Factors In ESP Classes

Masoud Zoghi, Leila Masoomi Far

Abstract


In the present study, attempts were made to investigate and contrast the demotivating factors in English classes from the viewpoint of ESP students at different proficiency levels. To this end, 134 ESP students were chosen from Islamic Azad University, Karaj Branch. Based on the scores obtained from Oxford Placement Test, the sample was divided into two groups, i.e. the intermediate level of proficiency students (n=60) and the elementary level of proficiency students (n=74). The data required for the study were collected by means of a demotivating factors questionnaire. The data collected were analyzed using the Minitab statistical package version 16. Results revealed that there were no significant differences among the demotivating factors perceived across the groups. From the viewpoint of both groups, teachers’ attitude and personality, their teaching methods, and the weakness of students in English vocabulary were among the highest frequency mentioned demotivating factors.

 


Keywords


ESP, demotivating factors, proficiency levels

Full Text:

PDF

References


Adams, G. R. and Schvaneveldt, J. D. 1985.Understanding research methods. New York: Longman.

Best, J. W. and Kahn, J. V. 2006.Research in Education. Pearson Education Inc.

Blackmore, J., 1996. Learning styles. Retrieved July 22, 2012, fromhttp://www.cyg.net/~jblackmo/diglib/

Carter, R. and Nunan, D.2001.Teaching English to speakers of other languages. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Deci, E. L. and Ryan, R. M. 1985.Intrinsic Motivation and Self-Determination in Human Behavior. New York: Plenum.

Dornyei, Z. 1998. Demotivation in foreign language learning. Paper presented at the TESOL 98 Congress, Seattle, WA March.

Dornyei, Z. 2001. Teaching and Researching Motivation. Harlow: Longman

Dornyei, Z. and Otto, I. 1998. Motivation in action: A process model of L2 motivation. Working Papers in Applied Linguistics. Thames Valley University, London.

Dweck, C. S. 1999. Self-Theories: Their Role in Motivation, Personality, and Development. Philadelphia, PA: Psychology Press.

Freud, S. 1966. The Complete Introductory Lectures on Psychoanalysis. New York: Norton.

Gorham, J. and Christophel, D. M. 1992. Students’ perception of teacher behaviors as motivating and demotivating factors in college classes. Communication Quarterly 40: 239-52.

Kikuchi, K. 2009. Listening to our learners’ voices: What demotivates Japanese high school students? Language Teaching Research 13(4): 435-71.

Oxford, R. L. 1998. Demotivation in Foreign Language Learning. Paper presented at the TESOL 98Congress, Seattle, WA, March.

Ushioda, E. 1998. Effective motivational thinking: A cognitive theoretical approach to the study of language learning motivation. In Soler, E.A. and Espurz, V. C. (eds), Current Issues in English Language Methodology.

Vallerand, R.J. 1997. Towards a hierarchical model of intrinsic and extrinsic motivation. In Zanna, M.P. (ed), Advances in Experimental Social Psychology. Vol, 29.San Diego, CA: Academic Press: 271-360.

Nunan, D., 1999. Second language teaching and learning. Boston:Heinle&Heinle Publishers.




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.7575/aiac.ijalel.v.3n.5p.22

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.




Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

2012-2020 (CC-BY) Australian International Academic Centre PTY.LTD

International Journal of Applied Linguistics and English Literature

To make sure that you can receive messages from us, please add the journal emails into your e-mail 'safe list'. If you do not receive e-mail in your 'inbox', check your 'bulk mail' or 'junk mail' folders.