The Effect of Pre-teaching Extended Prefabricated Lexical Bundles on the Writing Development of

Seiyed Mahdi Araghi, Mohammad Yousefi Oskuee, Sara Salehpour

Abstract


This study attempts to shed light on how a teacher’s instruction and guidance can cast aside writing inhibitions and bring about remarkable changes in the writing ability of advanced EFL students through the collaborative construction of extended chunks of language with the aim of enhancing lexical density and complexity and consequently injecting into learners a sense of satisfaction with their work. The sample included 40 TOEFL students selected out of 75 TOEFL students on the basis of their scores on a TOEFL test. The participants were randomly assigned into two groups-the control group and experimental group. After 20 instructional sessions both groups were assigned five writing tasks. The results reveal that the participants in experimental group outperformed their counterparts in control group. Overall, it is concluded that pre-teaching extended prefabricated lexical bundles can be a useful means of helping advanced students to improve their writing quality.


Keywords


Prefabricated lexical bundles, extended prefabricated lexical bundles, negative transfer, writing fluency

Full Text:

PDF

References


Biber, D., & Barbieri, F. (2007). Lexical bundles in university spoken and written Registers. In: Neely, E. & Cortes, V. A little bit about, analyzing and teaching lexical bundles in academic lectures. Georgia State University, 20-21.

Biber, D., Johansson, S., Leech, G., Conrad, S., & Finegan, E. (1999). Longman grammar of spoken and written English. In: Cortes, V. Lexical bundles in published and student disciplinarywriting: Examples from history and biology. Department of English, Iowa State University, 203 Ross Hall, Ames, IA 50014, USA, 399-411.

Brown, H. D. (2000). Principles of language learning and teaching (4th Ed.). London: Longman.

Chambers, F. (1997). What do we mean by fluency. Francine Chambers. University of Southampton, School of Modern Languages, Faculty of Arts, Avenue Campus. Southampton, SO17 LBF, UK, 25(4), 535-544.

Cortes, V. (2004). Lexical bundles in published and student disciplinary writing: Examples from history and biology. English for Specific Purposes, 23, 397–423. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.esp.2003.12.001

Erdogan, V. (2005). Contribution of error analysis to foreign language teaching. Mersin University Journal of the Faculty of Education, 1, 261-270.

Halliday M. A. K. (1971). In: Cortes, V. Lexical bundles in published and student disciplinary writing: Examples from history and biology. Iowa State University, Department of English, 203 Ross Hall, Ames, IA 50014, USA, 401, 404.

Hyland, K. 2008b. As can be seen: Lexical bundles and disciplinary variation. English for Specific Purposes, 27(1), 4–21.

Lenneberg, Eric H. (1967). The Biological Foundations o fLanguage. New York: John Wiley & Sons.

Lewis, M., 2000. Language in the lexical approach. In: Lewis, M.,eds. Teaching Collocation: further developments in the lexical approach. Language Teaching Publications,126-154.

Lewis, M. (2008). Teaching collocation. Hove: LTP Language Teaching Publications.

Mahmoud, A. (2005). Collocation errors made by Arab learners of English [Teachers Article]. Asian EFL Journal. Retrieved November, 14, 2009 from: http: www.asian-efl-journal.com/pta- August_05_ma.php.

Nesselhauf N., 2003. The use of collocations by advanced learners of English and some implications for teaching. Applied Linguistics, 24(2), 223-242.

Oldin, T. (1989). Language transfer: Cross-linguistic influence in language learning. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Sadeghi, K. (2009). Collocational differences between L1 and L2: Implications for EFL learners and teachers. TESL Canada Journal, 26, 100-125.

Shahheidaripour, G. (2000), Interlanguage development and collocational clash. An excerpt from the Author’s MA thesis, Azad University of Kerman, Iran.

Wood, D. (2001, June, 2004). In Search of Fluency: What Is It and How Can We Teach It? [Electronic version]. In: Al Sibai, D. Fluency: Oral Fluency: Promoting oral fluency of second language learners, literature review. King Saud University: In partial fulfillment of the requirements for Educational Linguistics, Department of English I. Dr. DoganBulut, December 18, 2004. 2, 4, 15-18, 22-24.

Yorio, C. (1979). On TESOL’79’.In: Strunkyt, G. &Jurkūnait, E. Lexical bundles in Humanities and Natural Sciences. Vilnius: University Faculty of Philology Department of English Philology. 5.




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.7575/aiac.ijalel.v.3n.2p.214

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.




Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

2012-2020 (CC-BY) Australian International Academic Centre PTY.LTD

International Journal of Applied Linguistics and English Literature

To make sure that you can receive messages from us, please add the journal emails into your e-mail 'safe list'. If you do not receive e-mail in your 'inbox', check your 'bulk mail' or 'junk mail' folders.