Grammar in Context using Comprehended Input

Mariam Mohamed Nor, Chong Seng Tong, Abdul Halim Ibrahim, Ng Yu Jin, Mohd Ariff Ahmad Tarmizi

Abstract


There have been so many ongoing disputes on different approaches to teaching grammar. This study aims to evaluate the effectiveness of teaching grammar using Gass comprehended Input technique (GCI) (1997) (implicit) and to explore the undergraduates’ perception on the GCI technique. The respondents consisted of 30 undergraduates’ who are currently pursuing their Bachelor of English. Using the qualitative method, the research instrument was a set of 23- item interview and content analysis of the students’ written work. Results showed that the teaching of grammar using explicit instructions was more preferred than implicit instruction for complex components in grammatical rules. However, implicit instruction is equally effective regardless of the proficiency levels to enable pedagogy to be executed. It is also noted that there is lots of room for improvement, since the undergraduates have a weak grasp of the basic tense aspect of English grammar. Therefore, the Malaysian Ministry of Education should consider having grammar formally taught in isolation as what was practised previously.


Keywords


Teaching Grammar, Gass comprehended Input technique (GCI)

Full Text:

PDF

References


Abdul Rashid Mohamed, Goh, L.L, Wan Rose Eliza. (2004). English Errors and Chinese Learners. Sunway College Journal 1, 83-97.

Andrews, K.L. (2007). The Effects of Implicit and Explicit Instruction on Simple and Complex Grammatical Structures for Adult English Language Learners. TESL-EJ Volume 11 (2)

Chomsky, N. (1976) Reflections on Language. London: Temple Smith

Corder, S.P. (1967).The Significance of learner’s errors’ .IRAL, 5, 161-170

Corder, S.P. (1971). ‘Idiosyncratic dialects and error analysis.’ IRAL, 9, 2,

Ellis, R. (1996). The study of second language acquisition. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Ellis, R. (1997). Second language research and language teaching. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Farrell T.S.C & Lim P.C. (2005). Conceptions of Grammar Teaching: A case study of Teachers’ Beliefs and Classroom Practices. TESL-EJ, 9, Number 2.

Gass, S. & Selinker, L. (1994). Second language acquisition: An introductory course. Hillsdale,N.J.:Lawrence Erlbaum.

Gass, S. (1997). Input, interaction, and the second language learner. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum. Associates.Greenbaum, S. & Quirk, R. (1992). A student’s grammar of the English language. Harlow, Essex: Pearson Education Limited.

Gribbin, B. (2005). Our ambivalence toward teaching grammar. English Journal, 94(3), 17.

Hazita Azman. (2004). Global English and English Literacy Education in Malaysia in Penny Lee and Hazita Azmab, Global English and Primary Schools: Challenges for Elementary Education, Melbourne: CAE Press.

Krashen, S. (1985). The input hypothesis. London, Longman.

Lim, J.M.H. (2006). Associating Interference with Strategy Instruction: An Investigation into the Learning of the Present Continuous. The Asian EFL Journal Quarterly, 8(2).

Mariam Mohamed Nor, Abdul Halim Ibrahim, & Rajentharan Shubbiah. (2009). Linguistics and language teaching (p.171) (2nd ed.). Open University Malaysia (OUM).

Mariam Mohamed Nor & Abdul Halim Ibrahim .(2006). Critical Thinking in Malay ESL students’ writing. A case study. UPSI Unpublished Research Report.

Shuib, M. (2009).Grammatical Awareness among Primary School English Language Teachers. GEMA Online Journal of Language Studies. Volume 9(1), 35-46

Nor Hashimah Jalaluddin, Norsimah Mat Awal & Kesumawati Abu Bakar. (2008). The Mastery of English Language among Lower Secondary School Students in Malaysia: A Linguistic Analysis. European Journal of Social Sciences, 17(12).

Nunan, S. (2005). Forgiving ourselves and forging ahead: Teaching grammar in a new millennium. English Journal, 94(4), 70-75.

Robinson, P. (1997) 'Generalizability and Automaticity of Second Language Learning under Implicit, Incidental, Enhanced, and Instructed Conditions', Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 19, 223-247.

Sams, L. (2003). How to teach grammar, analytical thinking, and writing: A method that works. English Journal, 92(3), 57-65.

Tony, B., Anne, T., & Richard, Q. (2000). Teaching Grammar: Working with student teachers. Changing English: Studies in reading and culture. March, Vol. 7, Issue 1, p7-21.

Wu, C.H. (2007).Spoken grammatically and EFL Teacher Candidates: Measuring the Effects of an Explicit Grammar Teaching Method on the Oral Grammatical Performance of Teacher Candidates. The Ohio State University.

Wu, K.Y. (2006). Teachers Beliefs and Grammar teaching Practices: Case Studies of Four ESL teachers University of Hong Kong.




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.7575/aiac.ijalel.v.3n.2p.75

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.




Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

2012-2019 (CC-BY) Australian International Academic Centre PTY.LTD

International Journal of Applied Linguistics and English Literature

To make sure that you can receive messages from us, please add the journal emails into your e-mail 'safe list'. If you do not receive e-mail in your 'inbox', check your 'bulk mail' or 'junk mail' folders.