Rationalizing Oral Corrective Feedback in Sudanese EFL Classrooms

Bashir Abuelnour Elbashir Hussein, Holi Ibrahim Holi Ali


This study is primarily investigating teachers’ perceptions about the application of oral corrective feedback in Sudanese EFL classrooms. It attempts to explore and rationalize the application of oral feedback in an EFL context, specifically in Sudan. For this purpose, a questionnaire was designed and distributed to (70) EFL secondary school teachers. An observation checklist was also used during class visits to further support the qualitative data. The results showed that EFL teachers have different views about giving oral corrective feedback. The findings also revealed that recast is the most commonly used approach, followed by elicitation and metalinguistic feedback, respectively. Clarification requests were found to be the least commonly used approach. Regarding teaching language systems, it was found that recasts is the most common approach used in teaching vocabulary and pronunciation whereas metalinguistic is highly preferred in teaching grammar. The study concluded with some relevant recommendations: First, it is the responsibility of the concerned authorities to make the school environment a better place for learning; class size and learning aids are important to help facilitate the role of the teacher in offering good quality teaching where feedback is provided for every learner. Second, educators and experts should hold regular seminars and conferences, issue magazines and periodicals on feedback and other relevant ELT topics. Moreover, teachers should be trained on how to give feedback on oral production. Finally, teachers should push students towards pair/group work because by doing so this will provide opportunities for ST-ST and T-ST feedback.



Rationalizing, oral corrective feedback, Sudanese EFL classrooms, clarification requests, metalinguistic, recast

Full Text:



Al-Harassi, S. (2007). An Analysis of the Nature of Oral corrective Feedback Types (in particular recasts) used by Omani Teachers in Cycle One and Cycle Two English basic Education Classroom, and their Effects on Learners' Immediate Response. Unpublished MA thesis, University of Stirling, UK.

Al-Samawi, A. M. (2000). Introduction to: Research Methods Techniques in linguistics and literature, Sana'a

Black,P, et al ( 1998 ). Inside the Black Box. Phi Delta Kappan, 80(2), 139-148.

Brooks, N. (1960). Language and Language Learning: Theory and Practice. New York: Harcourt, Brace and World.

Brown, H.D. (2007). Principles of Language Learning and Teaching. New York. Pearson Education.

Carroll, S., & Swain, M. (1993), Explicit and Implicit Negative Feedback. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 15, 357-386.

Chaudron, C. (1986). Teachers' Priorities in Correcting Learners' Errors in French Immersion Classes. In Day, R. (ed.), Talking to Learn: Conversation in Second Language Acquisition ( p. 64-84 ). Rowley, Massachusetts: Newbury House Publishers.

Chaudron, C. (1977). Second Language Classrooms. Research on Teaching and Learning. Cambridge, UK: Chun, A. (1982). Errors, Interaction, and Correction. A study of native/non-native conversation. TESOL Quarterly, 16, 537-547

Corder, S. (1967). The Significance of Learners' Errors. IRAL, 5(4), 1967.

Ellis, R. (1999). Second language Acquisition. New York: Oxford University Press.

Ellis, R. (2006). Explicit and Implicit Corrective Feedback and the Acquisition of L2 Grammar. Studies in Second Language Acquisition. Newbury House Publishers.

Gower. (2005). Teaching Practice: A Handbook for Teachers in Training. England: Macmillan education.

Harmer, J. (2006). The Practice of English Language Teaching. England: Longman.

Hattie, J., & Timperley, H. (2007). The Power of Feedback. Review of Educational Research, 77 (1), 81-112

Hedge, T. (2000). Teaching and Learning in the Language Classroom. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Hyland, F. (1998). The Impact of Teacher Written Feedback on Individual Writers. Journal of Second Language Writing, 7 (3), 255-286.

Krashen, S. (1985). The Natural Approach- Language Acquisition in the Classroom. Oxford: Pergamon.

Larsen, E. (1998). Feedback: Multiple Purposes for Management in Classrooms. Journal of Management Education, 22(1), pp.49-62.

Leki, I. (1991). The Preferences of ESL Students for Error Correction in College-level Writing Classes. Foreign Language Annals, 24, 203-218.Press.

Lowen, S. (2007). Measuring the Effects of Oral Corrective Feedback on L2 Knowledge. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Lightbown, P.M & Spada, N. (2006). How Languages are Learned. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Long, M. H. (1983). Native-speaker/ Non-native Speaker Conversation and the Negotiation Comprehensible Input. Applied linguistics, 4, 126-141

Long, M.H. (1996). The Role of the Linguistic Environment in Second Language Acquisition. Handbook of Second Language Acquisition. CA: Academic Press.

Lyster, R. & Ranta, L. (1997). Corrective Feedback and Learner Uptake: Negotiation of Form in Communicative Classrooms. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 19(1), 37-66

Lyster, R. (1998a). Form in Immersion Classroom Discourse: In or Out of Focus? Canadian Journal of

Mackey, A. (2000). How do learners perceive interactional feedback? Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 22, 471-497

Mosa, M. A. (2010). Feedback as a Tool to promote Students' Speaking Skills. MA dissertation, Nile Valley University, Sudan.

Nelson,K. (1984). The Development of Oral and Written Language in Social Contexts pp.31-56. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.

Oliver, R. (1995). Negative Feedback in Child NS-NNS Conversation. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 17, 459-481

Panova, I. & Lyster, R. (2002). Patterns of Corrective Feedback and Uptake in an Adult ESL Classroom. TESOL Quarterly, 36, (4), 573-595.

Reid, J.M. (1993). Teaching ESL Writing. NJ: Prentice Hall Regents.

Robson, C. (2011). Real World Research (3rd edition).Wiley: UK

Rydahl, S. (2005). Oral Feedback in the English Classroom Teachers' Thought and Awareness. Karltad University.

Sadler, R. (1998). Formative Assessment: Revisiting the Territory. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy and Practice, 5(1), 77-84.

Schmidt, R., & Frota, S. (1986). Developing Basic Conversational Ability in a Second Language: A case Study of an Adult Learner of Portuguese./Talking to learn: Conversation in Second Language Acquisition. Rowley: Newberry.

Schwartz, R. (1993). On Explicit and Negative Data Effecting and Affecting Competence and Linguistic Behavior. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, in Day, R (ed) pp 147 -163

Selinker, L. (1972). Interlanguage. IRAL. 10.2: 213-223

Sugita, Y. (2006). The Impact of Teachers' comment Types on Students' Revision. ELT Journal, 60(1), pp. 34-41.

Swain, M. (1985). Communicative Competence: Some Roles of Comprehensible Input and Comprehensible Output in its Development: Newberry House

Truscott, J. (1996). The Case against Grammar Correction in L2 Writing Classes. Language learning, 46, 327-369.

Ur, P. (2008). A course in Language Teaching: Practice and Theory. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Van Lier, L. (1988). The Classroom and the Language Learner. London: Longman.

White, S. (2007). Investing Effective Feedback Practices For Pre-service Teacher Education Students on Practicum. Teaching Education Journal, 18(4), pp. 299-311.

DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.7575/aiac.ijalel.v.3n.3p.217


  • There are currently no refbacks.

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

2012-2019 (CC-BY) Australian International Academic Centre PTY.LTD

International Journal of Applied Linguistics and English Literature

To make sure that you can receive messages from us, please add the journal emails into your e-mail 'safe list'. If you do not receive e-mail in your 'inbox', check your 'bulk mail' or 'junk mail' folders.