The Effects of Focused And Unfocused Written Corrective Feedback on The Grammatical Accuracy of Beginner EFL Learners

Fateme Saeb

Abstract


The study reported in this paper aimed at investigating the efficacy of written corrective feedback (CF) in improving beginner EFL learners’ grammatical accuracy. It also compared the effects of focused and unfocused written CF on the learners’ grammatical accuracy.  Seventy-nine beginner EFL students formed a control group (n= 29) and two experimental groups (focused= 25, unfocused= 25). The use of the third person singular ‘s’ morpheme for verbs was selected as the target structure to be treated through the provision of the written CF. The focused group received corrections concerning the use of the ‘s’ morpheme while the unfocused group received corrections for their all types of errors. The results indicated a significant improvement in accuracy for the two experimental groups from pretest to posttest. Also, the difference between the focused and unfocused groups in the posttest was not significant. These results suggested that providing written CF was effective for improving learners’ grammatical accuracy and that focused and unfocused written CF were not of differential effect in this regard. 

 


Keywords


Grammatical accuracy, Written corrective feedback, Focused and unfocused feedback

Full Text:

PDF

References


Bitchener, J. (2008). Evidence in support of written corrective feedback. Journal of Second Language Writing 17, 102–118. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jslw.2007.11.004

Bitchener, J., Knoch, U. (2008). The value of a focused approach to written corrective feedback. ELT Journal 6, 204–211.

Bitchener, J., Knoch, U. (2009). The relative effectiveness of different types of direct written corrective feedback. System, 37(2), 322–329. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2008.12.006

Bitchener, J., Knoch, U. (2010). The contribution of written corrective feedback to language development: A ten month investigation. Applied Linguistics 31, 193–214. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/applin/amp016

Bitchener, J., Young, S., Cameron, D. (2005). The effect of different types of corrective feedback on ESL student writing. Journal of Second Language Writing 9, 227–258.

Chandler, J. (2003). The efficacy of various kinds of error feedback for improvement in the accuracy and fluency of L2 student writing. Journal of Second Language Writing 12, 267–296. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S1060-3743(03)00038-9

Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences. second ed. Erlbaum, Mahwah, NJ.

Ellis, R., Sheen, Y., Murakami, M., Takashima, H. (2008). The effects of focused and unfocused written corrective feedback in an English as a foreign language context. System 36, 353–371. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2008.02.001

Evans, N. W., Hartshorn, K. J., Strong-Krause, D. (2011). The efficacy of dynamic written corrective feedback for university matriculated ESL learners. System 39, 229- 239. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2011.04.012

Nunan, D. (2002). Syllabus Design. Oxford University Press.

Pienemann, M., Johnston, M. (1987). Factors influencing the development of language proficiency. In D. Nunan (Ed.), Applying second language acquisition research (pp. 45–141). Adelaide: National Curriculum Research Centre, Adult Migrant English Program.

Sheen, Y. (2007). The effect of focused written corrective feedback and language aptitude on ESL learners' acquisition of articles. TESOL Quarterly 41, 255–283.

Sheen, Y., Wright, D., Moldawa, A. (2009). Differential effects of focused and unfocused written correction on the accurate use of grammatical forms by adult ESL learners. System 37, 556–569.

http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2009.09.002

Truscott, J. (1996). The case against grammar correction in L2 writing classes. Language Learning 46, 327–369.

http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-1770.1996.tb01238.x

Truscott, J. (2007). The effect of error correction on learners' ability to write accurately. Journal of Second Language Writing 16, 255–272. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jslw.2007.06.003




DOI: https://doi.org/10.7575/aiac.ijalel.v.3n.2p.22

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.




Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

2012-2022 (CC-BY) Australian International Academic Centre PTY.LTD

International Journal of Applied Linguistics and English Literature

To make sure that you can receive messages from us, please add the journal emails into your e-mail 'safe list'. If you do not receive e-mail in your 'inbox', check your 'bulk mail' or 'junk mail' folders.