Assessment of Tensile Bond Strength of Fiber-Reinforced Composite Resin to Enamel Using Two Types of Resin Cements and Three Surface Treatment Methods

Tahereh Ghaffari, Shima Ghasemi, Amirreza Babaloo, Amin Nourizadeh

Abstract


Background: Resin-bonded bridgework with a metal framework is one of the most conservative ways to replace a tooth with intact abutments. Visibility of metal substructure and debonding are the complications of these bridgeworks. Today, with the introduction of fiber-reinforced composite resins, it is possible to overcome these complications. The aim of this study was to evaluate the bond strength of fiber-reinforced composite resin materials (FRC) to enamel. Methods: Seventy-two labial cross-sections were prepared from intact extracted teeth. Seventy-two rectangular samples of cured Vectris were prepared and their thickness was increased by adding Targis. The samples were divided into 3 groups for three different surface treatments: sandblasting, etching with 9% hydrofluoric acid, and roughening with a round tapered diamond bur. Each group was then divided into two subgroups for bonding to etched enamel by Enforce and Variolink II resin cements. Instron universal testing machine was used to apply a tensile force. The fracture force was recorded and the mode of failure was identified under a reflective microscope. Results: There were no significant differences in bond strength between the three surface treatment groups (P=0.53). The mean bond strength of Variolink II cement was greater than that of Enforce (P=0.04). There was no relationship between the failure modes (cohesive and adhesive) and the two cement types. There was some association between surface treatment and failure mode. There were adhesive failures in sandblasted and diamond-roughened groups and the cohesive failure was dominant in the etched group. Conclusion: It is recommended that restorations made of fiber-reinforced composite resin be cemented with VariolinkII and surface-treated by hydrofluoric acid.

 

Keywords: Tensile bond strength; surface treatment methods; fiber-reinforced composite resin


Full Text:

PDF

References


Zumbuhl R, Lutz F, Krejci I. In-vitro studies of resin-bonded slot composite bridges compared to conventionally prepared composite bridges. Schweiz Monatsschr Zahnmed. 2000;110:505-522. [In German]

el-Sherif MH, el-Messery A, Halhoul MN. The effects of alloy surface treatments and resins on the retention of resin-bonded retainers. J Prosthet Dent. 1991;65:782-786.

Dillon M, Fenton A, Watson P. Bond strength of composite to perforated and etched metal surfaces. J Dent Res. 1983;62:12-19.

Ferrari M, Cagidiaco MC, Breschi R. Evaluation of resin-bonded retainers with the scanning electron microscope. J Prosthet Dent. 1988;59:160-165.

Saunders WP. The influence of chemically active composite resins upon the tensile retentive impact strength of resin bonded bridges. Restorative Dent. 1986;2:86, 88-90.

Brantley CF, Kanoy BE, Jr., Sturdevant JR. Thermal effects on retention of resin-bonded retainers. Dent Mater. 1986;2:67-71.

Latzel D, Behr M. Fracture strength of molar-crowns made of Targis/Vectris and Empress using composite and hybrid ionomer cementation. J Dent Res. 1999;78:478-482.

Kolbeck C, Rosentritt M. In vitro examination of polyethylene fiber-reinforced composite bridges. J Dent Res. 1999;78:302-307.

Loose M, Rosentritt M, Leibrock A, Behr M, Handel G. In vitro study of fracture strength and marginal adaptation of fibre-reinforced-composite versus all ceramic fixed partial dentures. Eur J Prosthodont Restor Dent. 1998;6:55-62.

Cha YJ, Yang JH. Resin-bonded fixed partial denture using In-Ceram and Targis-Vectris system: A clinical report. J Korean Acad Prosthodont. 2000;38:375-381.

D'Arcangelo C, Vanini L. Effect of three surface treatments on the adhesive properties of indirect composite restorations. J Adhes Dent. 2007;9:319-326.

Piwowarczyk A, Lauer HC, Sorensen JA. In vitro shear bond strength of cementing agents to fixed prosthodontic restorative materials. J Prosthet Dent. 2004;92:265-273.

Denizoglu S, Hanyaloglu CS, Aksakal B. Tensile bond strength of composite luting cements to metal alloys after various surface treatments. Indian J Dent Res. 2009;20:174-179.

Goracci C, Bertelli E, Ferrari M. Bonding to worn or fractured incisal edges: shear bond strength of new adhesive systems. Quintessence Int. 2004;35:21-27.

Feilzer AJ, de Gee AJ, Davidson CL. Setting stresses in composites for two different curing modes. Dent Mater. 1993;9:2-5.

Kececi AD, Ureyen Kaya B, Adanir N. Micro push-out bond strengths of four fiber-reinforced composite post systems and 2 luting materials. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 2008;105:121-128.

Watanabe J, Powers A, Lorey R. Invitro bonding of prosthodontic adhesive to dental alloys. J Dent Res. 1988;67:479-483.

Ernst CP, Wenzl N, Stender E, Willershausen B. Retentive strengths of cast gold crowns using glass ionomer, compomer, or resin cement. J Prosthet Dent. 1998;79:472-476.

Utz KH, Gruner M, Buscher M. Adhesive strengths of cast crowns with various types of cements. Dtsch Zahnarztl Z. 1990;45:767-769. [In German]


Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.




Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

2013-2019 (CC-BY) Australian International Academic Centre PTY.LTD.

Advances in Bioscience and Clinical Medicine